Caquetá, Colombia se le planta al petróleo

Caquetá, Colombia blocks petroleum extraction in the Andes-Amazon foothills

Yesterday morning ESMAD attacked one hundred peasants who blocked a bridge in southern Caqueta so they could not move the truck of Chinese oil company Emerald Energy. That clash between riot police and farmers who oppose oil project is a double warning bell for the government.

For one thing, because it brings  the headache in which he became the Government  the resistance of the people of Piedras, in Tolima, against AngloGold Ashanti and reissued because the pitfalls that had the mining and energy locomotive when interact with local communities.

And secondly, because it anticipates one of the biggest dilemmas that will have the government of President Juan Manuel Santos in the years ahead: it needs the resources of the mining industry to fund the implementation of any peace agreements but, at the same time, to the extent that social mobilization grow it probably will turn more and more against this sector.

A blockade to curb Emerald
Two months ago Florida farmers protesting against the entrance to the Chinese oil exploration Emerald Energy.
One argument of farmers is that the jungles of Caqueta that area are home to the beautiful Caqueta monkey, a species discovered five years ago and in grave danger. Photo courtesy of IUCN.

Since 4 May, a hundred peasants of various villages in the municipality of Valparaiso, two hours from Florence, were planted on the bridge over the creek La Cacho, allowing the passage of cars but cerrándoselo vehicles Emerald Energy.

That way, they named the ‘Bridge Resistance’ is on the way to the villages of Florida where the company which  is part of the Chinese group Sinochem – do you plan to dig a stratigraphic well that allows you to understand if the area has the same potential as their fields in San Vicente del Caguan (currently temporarily closed by the fall in oil prices).

Opposed to the idea of ​​an oil project, according to them by poor environmental experiences in nearby towns such as San José del Fragua, farmers organized themselves and formed what they called the Commission for Life Water.

“We have no clarity on what the damage that oil development can bring to the region and the monkey, but the Government has refused to listen, much less, consider what we say. We are a nonentity, “says Jose Antonio Saldarriaga, one of the leaders of the peasants who have been organized since Emerald came to socialize the oil block-part project that El Nogal concessioned in 2012 a year ago.

By ‘the monkey’ Saldarriaga refers to another of the flags of farmers bridge the conservation of nice monkey Caqueta, a small primate reddish hair that  was discovered in 2010  in the jungles of the department and it is  listed as’ in critical situation ‘  (the most severe) by the Red Book of endangered species of IUCN.

Since last week it was rumored that the national government would send ESMAD to unlock the track, so the governor Miraist Marta Liliana Agudelo called Interior Minister Juan Fernando Cristo and explained that Saturday would be a meeting with all parties to dialogue. He declined to make any decisions until later.

All breathed calmer. That day agreed and  outlined a document with the points on which they agreed and disagreed  farmers, the Government, Corpoamazonía (the Amazon CAR), the University of Amazonia and the Diocese of Florence. They agreed to ask that the subject not be resolved by force and that a moratorium be made ​​in the exploration of Emerald until there was clarity.

So he grabbed him by the Governor-in even- surprise arrival of some 150 riot police from Bogota early Tuesday.

Less than two hours later they had already dismantled the camp, held the peasants on a farm and cleared the way so they could spend the Chinese oil machines, which according to the government for now only seeks to repair the road as part of the social investment made in the area.

For farmers, this response was not convincing.

“We wanted to read the agreement, but said the commander who had 50 days at the encampment and that was illegal. They are not interested any claim of us farmers, “says Cesar Garcia, one of the leaders of this farming community that came displaced by paramilitaries in 2002 and only returned in 2010.

“If the authorities of the municipality and the department had an agreement with us not to use force, and even going to be talking with the government in three days in Bogota, we thought they were going to wait a bit. But this was overwhelming, “says Saldarriaga.

The balance, according to farmers, was three seriously injured. Juan Chavez, a peasant leader, was hit in the head and, after vomiting blood, was taken to a hospital in Florence. Two others ended in the health center of Valparaiso: Christopher Saldarriaga son of Jose Antonio wounded in the head and arm and Ana Pantévez with a bruised arm.

Two people were arrested and later released. Gregorio Perez 60, one of the leaders of the blockade, came out around noon. And Carlos Paez, who was filming the scene and who confiscated the camera, was released in the evening.

All this led them to organize a demonstration in front of City Hall yesterday and again today, showing that the emergence of ESMAD, far from resolving the issue, is fermenting further.

Without dialogue to defuse the social bomb
Valparaiso case back to bare the difficulties of the Government to facilitate relations between communities and oil and mining companies in the sector led by Minister Tomas Gonzalez.
Deputy Interior Minister Carlos Ferro has met several times with the landless progress achieved in the dialogue, which now resume its -the Chief Minister Juan Fernando Christ Thursday.

The conflict escalated in Valparaiso over a year and exploded in less than two months. Two months in which, in spite of multiple signals and warnings, no how to avoid it.

Social bomb that is due in large part to that, as  told La Silla in a documentary about the Doima case – there is no room for dialogue between the government, business sectors such as mining and hydrocarbons and local communities, where they  can talk their concerns and prevent the tension escalates  until pathways made ​​or referendums, as in Piedras (Tolima) or Tauramena (Casanare).

In fact, the only driver to create those spaces which called Avanza and started in the oil towns of Casanare- was  nipped in the bud in a change of ministers  as soon threw its first results. A year ago it was revived, but with a lower profile.

This lack of spaces for dialogue has led to relationships with communities protesting, like Valparaiso, end up being one more give and take preventive and cyclical which often messy.

In this corner of southern Caqueta talks they have not failed, but with few results. In fact, meetings and letters left over.

The May 29 farmers gathered in the Diocese of Florence with Deputy Interior Minister Carlos Ferro, a group that also included the governor and his Secretary of Government, the commanders of the police and army, representatives of the company and the Colombian Petroleum Association.

From that meeting came the commitment to make a table of dialogue between the company and the communities, which met four days but could not overcome the obstacle blocking the bridge. The farmers asked the government a week to evaluate the concession contract with Emerald, but according to two people familiar with the process-he refused and said it was his legal duty to ensure that the company could explore a block which had already signed a contract.

There began an exchange of letters between many. Francisco Jose Lloreda, former minister who now leads the Colombian Petroleum Association,  asked the government to intervene  because the proposed Emerald “has the approval of the communities directly adjacent to the site [but] a group of people who no way represent the community’s area of influence have blocked the bridge. ”

The attorney  said that the blockade was illegal  and criminally punishable. The bishop of Florence, Jesus Omar Mejia  replied that the case showed  “the consequences of the ineffectiveness of the institutions responsible for economic management – Environmental” and asked him to accompany the dialogue.

Green Senator Claudia Lopez, who introduced a bill that would create a ‘municipal environmental councils’ that would involve communities,  wrote to Santos and three of his ministers  insisting “open a space for dialogue (…) in which they present the scope of the project, listen, discuss and citizen concerns are resolved. ” The Ministry of Environment Gabriel Vallejo  replied that it was not their responsibility , but the National Authority of Environmental Licenses (Anla).

The liberal representative Harry Gonzalez, which has also met with the peasants managed to schedule a meeting with all Thursday in the office of Christ minister, but was surprised by the entrance of Esmad.

The government insists that there are opportunities for dialogue, but that the community did not want to use them.

“We’ve been to all instances of dialogue, but there are a closed position and will not admit reasons,” he told La Silla Deputy Interior Minister Carlos Ferro.

They made three proposals which, according to Ferro, the community would not accept: lift the blockade on the bridge, an audit with the University of the Amazon on the business practices of Emerald and do some research on environmental issues. And he insisted that it is a company with such good levels of environmental management even have to Gerardo Viña, who was Sector Manager of the Ministry of Environment in the first government of Alvaro Uribe, as manager of planning. (La Silla tried unsuccessfully to contact Emerald Energy).

¿Caqueta oil?
The liberal representative Harry Gonzalez insists that it is necessary to debate on the development model of the Amazon which includes the Caquetá- and is designed to address environmental persones in the region.
Gov. Miraist Marta Liliana Agudelo has also called for more stringent rules hydrocarbon exploitation in the Amazon game.

Beyond the ‘case Valparaiso’, mostly in Caqueta-peasants, politicians, academics and social actors insist that the department has a “special characteristics” that require oil policy is different.

“The bottom line is that discussion of Caqueta must have a differentiated policy because it is different exploit hydrocarbons in an area of ​​great biodiversity,” says Congressman Harry Caqueta Gonzalez, who accompanied the peasants of Valparaiso weekend. “We have an environmental problem, thanks to the model of ranching and coca, and you are the most deforested region of the country and the second on the continent after the Paraguayan Chaco. And Track is a contradiction.”

Gonzalez was also the author of the idea, in the Development Plan Santos II, that Caquetá back part of the departments of the Amazon and not the ‘South Central’ with the Huila and Tolima (as it was in 2010) a geographical argument being used to defend the region needs a different system.

His view is shared in many sectors, from the business to the Church, through the political class and peasants. All are asking the government a debate on the development model for the Amazon region and, above all, a level playing different -and more exigentes- to exploit oil in the jungle.

“You must leave a new regulation in the Amazon that includes the Caquetá because there are very fragile environmental conditions and heritage. The fact that there is awarded oil blocks at odds with what Santos promised in UN especially protect the Amazon ecosystem. There is a contradiction between what is said and done, “says Eduardo Moya, President of the Chamber of Commerce of Florence.

This debate is crucial because, although  today only represents 3.7 percent  of national production, the Caguan-Putumayo basin is, in  the words of an entrepreneur – “the oil future of the country”.

For now, the next round will be this Thursday in the office of Christ. There are farmers, Marta Liliana Agudelo Governor, Congressman Harry Gonzalez, President of the Chamber of Commerce and the bishop of Florence to discuss the ‘case Valparaiso’ and, in general, of its oil troubles.

“We do not take part in this conflict, but [the peasants of Valparaiso] claim something from the Interior see right: that the terms of reference with which the blocks are allocated in Caqueta be revised” says the governor in charge Sandra Milena Rodriguez, who asked them to lift the blockade but also require a space for dialogue. “We are all asking for it. We are speaking the same language. ”

– See more at:

Original source: The Empty Chair

Yesterday morning, the anti-riots police pressured Where WHO around 100 Peasants blocking a bridge in the south of Caquetá, in the foothills of the Colombian Amazon-Andes region, With the intention to stop the trucks of the Chinese oil company Emerald Energy. This confrontation Between the police and the Peasants resisting an oil extraction project is a double alert for the Colombian government. For one side, it brings back the headache That the resistance of the people from Piedras, Tolima towards a gold mining project under the name of La Colosa, Anglo Gold Ashanti, Became for the government two years ago. It reissues the obstacles That the “mining-electric development engine” When you HAD interacting With Local Communities. On the other hand, it anticipates one of the strongest dilemma That the current President Juan Manuel Santos will Have to face in the following years: I need the economical resources from the extractive economy in order to take the peace agreements With the guerrilla forward, but at the same time, the social mobilization grows stronger each time against esta development model.

riot Caqueta

The 4rth of May, 100 Peasants started near the blockage on the bridge Which They called “the bridge of resistance”. This road leads to the area Where this company, part of the Chinese group Sinochem , is willing to drill an oil well. Based on the bad experiences of other Neighboring towns with oil extraction, the Peasants from the Municipality of Valparaiso organized into what Themselves They Have Given the name of “Commission for the Life of the Water”.

Emerald Petroleum Caqueta

“We don ‘t have any clarity about the effects the project will Have on the region, but we know we must have a voice to speak our mind,” says Jose Antonio Saldarriaga one of the peasant leaders That resistance has held since 2012, When company will Went to socialize the project. One of the main Reasons of Their resistance is the protection of the “pretty monkey” of Caqueta, a species of red-haired monkey Identified That was for the first time in the jungles of the region, and in Which is cataloged as “critically endangered “(The most serious) in The Red Book of Endangered Species of the IUCN.

nice monkey Caqueta

A few weeks before the arrival of the anti-riots police, the Peasants HAD built a joint agreement With the local government, the environmental Authorities, the University of Amazonia, and the Church of Florence, the capital city of the Caqueta region. They Requested for no force used, and for a moratorium to the exploration activities of Emerald Until there is clarity about the project, Impacts and review of the inhabitants of the region. In Spite of esta agreement, the government sent 150 anti-riots police men. Several of the leaders where put into jail, others injured and staff Where Where Confiscated cameras, sustaining That the blockage of the bridge was illegal.

Once again, as It Happened With Doima / Piedras, Tolima, there are no spaces Dialogue Between the Government, the companies from the mining and oil companies, and Local Communities, Where These can express Their anguish. Because of esta lack of coordination and dialogue, the Citizens Have had to apply legal actions like the Popular Consultations in Piedras and Tauramena.


Related Posts

‘It’s possible to fight the giant and to win’- YLNM’s Mariana Gomez on Cajamarca, peace and extractivism
Cumarál to hold popular consultation on oil extraction in Andes foothills
La tragedia de El Dorado: Un salvavidas para el Rio Atrato
A Colossal Choice: Cajamarca prepares to decide whether to ban mining
No to industrial mega-mining for gold in French Guiana! Non à la méga-mine d’or industrielle en Guyane!  ¡No a la mega mina de oro en la Guayana Francesa!
US and Canadian Mining Companies Seek to Sue Colombia for $16.5billion
Venezuelan Indians attacked amidst mining mayhem

Venezuelan Indians attacked amidst mining mayhem

Report: Ecuacorriente S.A’s Mirador Project forcibly evicting communities
A Message of Solidarity to the People of Mariana, Brazil
COP21: Call for international recognition of rights of nature and communities
Yes to Life, No to Mining participates in the workshop “Mining and Energy Multinational Companies Strategies and Participation Mechanisms for Communities Defending their Territory” – Caquetá, Colombia
Peru Signs Bill to Protect 5,000sq Miles of Amazon from Mining
Footage Showing aftermath of Mining Dam Collapse in Brazil

Footage Showing aftermath of Mining Dam Collapse in Brazil

  • Written on: 10 November 2015
  • Posted under: Videos
Gold mining boom threatening communities in Suriname
Report: Using Technology and Community Research to Protect Ancestral Land in the Amazon
Where They Stand: Technology and Community Research used to protect ancestral land in Guyana
Victory for U’wa Nation in quest to defend territory
Mapping Initiative:  Gold Mining in Suriname
Deforestation in Peru: Building a dramatic future in the Amazon and the Andean Region


Ecuador Victims Can Seek Compensation from Chevron, Canada Supreme Court Rules
Court Halts Mining in Yaigoje Apaporis National Park
Achievements of the Global Day Against Mega Mining
Colombia was part of the Global Day for Action Against Mega Mining
Gold For Green Forests

Gold For Green Forests

Caquetá, Colombia blocks petroleum extraction in the Andes-Amazon foothills
Venezuelan tribes protest against violent mining gangs
Local researchers from YAIA receive the Equator Initiative Prize from UNDP in the Amazon

Start a Conversation. Share Words of Solidarity.

This website is about building a movement. We can only build a movement when we connect with one another. We invite you to do just that…

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *