COP Out: The hollow promise of the Paris climate deal

YLNM Coordinator for North Europe Hal Rhoades discusses why, despite the hype, the climate agreement hatched by world governments in Paris won’t save us from climate catastrophe. He argues that people’s movements, not multilateral theatrics, represent our best hope for avoiding climate disaster.


 

If you’ve been following international media coverage of the climate change agreement recently signed into being by world governments in Paris, you could be forgiven for thinking the world has just taken a massive stride in the effort to tackle climate change and create a safer, more just world for all.

COP21ProtestClimateJustice_1

The Paris climate deal is undoubtably an unprecedented political success. Nations used COP21 as a stage to play out arguably the biggest act of world diplomacy ever, winning huge political capital and public confidence in the process. But ultimately the deal they have struck is a hollow one in the only ways that really matter; namely the deal’s ability to prevent catastrophic climate change and to do so justly.

According to leading climatologist Kevin Anderson, Deputy Director of the Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, this deal is “weaker than Copenhagen,” the disastrous agreement of 2009, and “not in line with the latest science”.

“COP21 negotiators are looking at the Paris agreement with rose-stained glasses. The truth is that we have is a negotiated failure that has ignored sound science and justice,” says Enteng Bautista of Kalikasan PNE, Philippines.

COP21 has been framed as a success, as we knew it would be. But, as with all agreements that are this ‘high level’, littered with technical jargon that renders them indecipherable to most people, the devil is in the detail…

No Respect for Earth’s Limits 

In the new deal, the world’s governments have committed to peaking carbon emissions ‘as soon as possible’, and decarbonising our societies worldwide ‘in the second half of this century’. But these same governments fail to call for binding climate action, give clear definitions of the action required and set all important deadlines for these efforts; deadlines that acknowledge Earth’s limits, and that must be met if we wish to avoid enduring and inflicting untold suffering.

In order to avoid catastrophic warming of over 1.5 – 2°C above pre-industrial levels, we must drastically reduce emissions of carbon and other green house gases (GHGs) into our shared atmosphere. The latest climate science suggests that to achieve this goal global carbon emissions must peak by 2020, and be reduced to almost zero by 2050 to have even a 66% chance of avoiding warming above 2°C.

Much praise has been given to parties to the Paris agreement for acknowledging that global average temperature rises must remain “well below 2°C above pre-industrial levels and to pursue efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1.5°C.” Big polluter nations had previously refused to acknowledge the 1.5°C goal called for by the world’s most climate-vulnerable nations, but it is now the showpiece of their post-Paris PR- a signifier of willingness to tackle the ‘climate issue’ that is winning them serious political capital.

However, the odds that the Paris deal will keep average global warming below 1.5°C are slim to say the least. The details of the text reveal that up until 2020, when the Paris deal comes into force, countries are only required to reduce emissions according to voluntary pledges called Intended Nationally Determined Commitments (INDCs). Added together, the INDC commitments of all the world’s governments involve emitting enough carbon to put us on course for a 2.7-3.7°C average global temperature rise by 2100.

Countries have agreed on a global ‘stock take’ process that will see them come back to the table to revise their INDCs and ‘increase their ambition’ every five years. However, by the time they are required to re-examine these targets in 2020 there is every chance we will have emitted enough carbon to lock ourselves into warming of 1.5°C-plus, and next to no chance global carbon emissions will have peaked as the latest science tells us they must.

The Paris agreement says governments should ‘pursue policies’ domestically to make sure their inadequate INDCs are met, but provides no means of enforcing them. This may be made an impossible task as the deal leaves the door open for free trade deals like TTIP and TPP to trump climate legislation, allowing corporations to sue governments that put in place progressive climate policies that infringe their current and future profits.

The best way to ensure we do not blaze past 1.°5C and risk a degree of warming that will see many small island nations and coastal areas inundated by the sea and massive impacts on ecosystems worldwide, is to keep fossil fuels in the ground. This will involve treading on the fossil fuel industry’s toes, to say the least, but instead the Paris agreement gives them a legal edge and a host of benefits-by-omission .

According to the latest science, as much as 80% of all known fossil fuel reserves must remain unexploited and unburned if we hope to avoid climate catastrophe. In practice this means 100% of tar sands, 82% of coal, 49% of gas and 33% of oil must be left in the ground.

And yet there is not a single mention of fossil fuels- oil, gas, coal or tar sands- in the Paris deal and many big polluting industries go entirely unmentioned and unscathed, including shipping and aviation.

Meanwhile, governments gave direct and indirect subsidies to the fossil fuel industries worth $5.3trillion in 2015 (that’s $10 million every minute). This figure dwarfs the $10.2 billion promised by governments to the Green Climate Fund which was ostensibly set up to redistribute cash to combat climate change in some of the world’s most vulnerable nations.

Without clear timelines for peak emissions and decarbonisation based on the latest science; without massive and immediate emissions reductions above and beyond current national pledges; and without any appetite to end fossil fuel extraction, the Paris agreement renders its own aims nigh-on unachievable and is out of touch with planetary reality.

No Justice for the most vulnerable

To make the massive transition from a world addicted to fossil fuels to one powered by renewables, the International Energy Agency estimates $1 trillion will be required every year by 2020, with $680 billion of this needing to go to countries in the Global South. These nations will also require $150 billion per year by 2020 and $300billion by 2050 to pay for adaptation according to the UN Environment Programme.

According to the principles of climate justice, reflected in the official COP talks through the concept of ‘Common But Differentiated Responsibility’, rich nations responsible for the majority of historic carbon emissions, and therefore the climate crisis, should stump up the majority of this money.

However, these same nations are promising just $100 billion per year by 2020; just an eighth of what is required. There is no concrete process for reviewing and increasing this figure written into the deal, only an aspiration to do so. Nor is there any certainty of what form this ‘climate finance’ will take- it could come as private finance with conditions on repayment, or be re-allocated from aid budgets.

These paltry pledges reflect rich countries’ long-standing fight to avoid being saddled with major responsibility for redistributing wealth to help global south nations mitigate and adapt to climate change. Their success in this battle is also reflected by the fact that there is no wording in the deal that creates an obligation for rich nations to do their fair share to combat climate change according to their historic responsibilities.

In the section of the agreement that deals with loss and damages occurring as a result of climate change today and in the future, the deal provides “no basis for liability and compensation”, meaning that rich states and their corporate entities cannot be sued for their role in causing climate change. This leaves those nations already suffering the impacts of climate change after just 1°C of warming disempowered, isolated and facing worse times ahead.

The deal also fails to detail how those workers dependent on polluting industries for their living will be supported and retrained in decent, climate-friendly work as part of a Just Transition towards a zero-carbon economy. This is a crucial part of the climate justice puzzle, key to weakening the grip of the fossil fuel industry at the level of the household as well as the policy and financial level.

At every turn, those who are most vulnerable to the impacts of climate change and climate action stand to be most negatively affected by the terms of the Paris agreement. And it doesn’t stop here…

False solutions: A whole flock of wolves

Around the planet Indigenous Peoples, local communities and the groups supporting them are taking action to combat climate change in ways that are socially just and ecologically sane.

It is no coincidence that the territories of Indigenous Peoples are home to 80% of the world’s remaining biodiversity, including the forests that draw down vast quantities of carbon. Nor that small scale and peasant farmers around the world can feed themselves, their families and 70% of the world’s population from just 25% of the world’s farmland, largely without the use of fossil fuels and whilst sequestering carbon in healthy, life giving soils.

These peoples’ long and intimate relationship of care with their land enables them to live in a mutually enhancing way with the planet and care for the climate. As such, recognising the indigenous and human rights of these peoples and their central role in combatting climate change is a crucial part of climate justice.

Yet it is precisely these peoples who are stripped of their rights and see their Earth-centred practices ignored by the Paris agreement. Mentions of human rights and Indigenous rights have been removed from the final deal. Previous drafts had included wording that would mean all solutions to climate change would have to be implemented with respect for these rights.

Instead of acknowledging the people as part of the solution, as outlined in Oil Watch’s Annex 0 proposal, the world’s governments have chosen to open the door to false solutions with a track record of failure and contributing to the violation of people’s rights and nature’s rights.

Language around renewable technologies in the agreement is vague, which could prove crucial. With this deal, governments had a key opportunity to define the character of the ‘renewable revolution’, which undoubtably needs to happen fast, and ensure these technologies avoid reproducing the injustices of our current energy system.

First and foremost, we need renewable technologies that are designed and produced for a post-extractive world, emphasising longevity, durability and recyclability to ensure we do not have to mine in perpetuity to build these technologies, destroying even more ecosystems and violating the rights of communities in the process.

As far as possible, renewable technologies must also be decentralised and democratically owned by communities around the globe, rather than part of privatised mega projects. This will help us to avoid the kind of energy monopolies that see millions, even in wealthy nations like the UK, go without sufficient energy because they cannot afford it, whilst others consume more than their fair share. As has been mentioned, those nations with the least capacity to make the transition to 100% renewables need to be supported to do so by economically wealthy nations.

None of these caveats and nuances are contained in the Paris agreement, leaving governments free to dictate the nature of the renewable technologies they will encourage. This is bad news as governments worldwide have a track record of supporting destructive mega projects, such as hydro dams, that displace peoples and disrupt ecosystems, the healthy functioning of which is key for climate resilience. Control over these projects and their profits is frequently held by private companies and corporations.

The Paris deal also gives an overt endorsement to carbon markets, referred to in the deal as ‘internationally transferred mitigation outcomes’. Through these markets, corporations and others can buy the right to continue polluting, supposedly offsetting their impacts by buying and protecting forests and other ‘carbon sinks’ elsewhere in the world.

Market schemes such as REDD+ and so-called Climate Smart Agriculture have been broadly criticised by Indigenous and peasant groups, as well as NGOs, for financialising nature and facilitating ‘green’ land grabs that violate the indigenous and human rights of those living the solutions to climate change. These financial fixes have been proven incapable of addressing climate change. They ignore the fact that the financialisation of nature aids and abets its destruction by reducing complex ecosystems and their homeostatic functions to units of capital to be bought and sold.

Indeed, solving the climate crisis is a secondary aim for the corporate entities pushing these market-based schemes. Profit is paramount, but climate change lends a useful framing for pushing GMOs and soil carbon credits in place of food sovereignty and privatising forests and ‘marginal land’ instead of recognising and supporting indigenous ownership and management.

Language in the deal around ambitions to decarbonise the global economy between 2050-2100 is rendered in terms of achieving climate ‘balance’, defined as equilibrium between emissions and carbon sinks. This indicates that governments are not intending to stop burning fossil fuels, and that, as well as incentivising carbon markets and green land grabs, they intend to turn to unproven technologies such as Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) and Bio-Energy with CCS (BECCS) as solutions to the climate crisis.

Cripplingly expensive and unproven at any kind of scale, CCS and BECCS are touted as a silver bullet solutions to the climate crisis by the fossil fuel industry. The promise of these technologies is that we will be able to keep burning fossil fuels, but capture the carbon created and store it deep in the earth. Their mere existence is used as an excuse to keep the fossil fuel economy chugging on. Critics say the likelihood of CCS, and variations of it, being able to play any meaningful part in keeping us below 1.5-2C are nil. Even energy bosses, who are desperate for this technology to come good, admit it won’t be viable before 2030 (if at all). But as the Paris agreement demonstrates, CCS technologies could play a key part in encouraging a false confidence (or, more cynically, a sly corporate diversion) in climate technofixes that sees us soar past these limits.

Climate change is a ‘super wicked problem’, solving it requires us to look to its roots- the philosophical and economic commodification of nature- and employ constellational thinking to bring about true systems change. But the Paris deal has fallen into the trap of capitalist solutionism. Denying the complexities of the interconnected crises we face, it places faith in those who have done the most to create the problem and who are lining up for a feeding frenzy of disaster capitalism that has many names:

REDD+, Climate Smart Agriculture, GMOs, BECCS, CCS, Mega Hydro…

A Climate Call to Action

So, what do we do when our leaders have failed us, yet call their failure “our best chance of tackling climate change”, in the words of President Obama?

The answer lies outside the stuffy negotiation chambers of the official COP21 space, littered with plastic animals and the sterile stalls of solutionists, with the people’s movements that have brought us this far.

Make no mistake, politicians would not have met in Paris and thrashed out even this hollow deal were it not for the mounting awareness and pro-activeness of ordinary people worldwide. And now that our governments seem to have reached the limit of what they consider politically possible, it is up to us to impress upon them that this is not socially, ecologically or climactically acceptable.

We need everyone to understand that we have not been saved by the Paris deal. That is the first task we face- to cut through the media sensationalism and confront the reality, no matter how desperate we are for a success.

We must look to strengthen our movements to keep fossil fuels in the ground. From the snake-way of the Keystone XL pipelinein North America, to the lignite fields of Germany, to the lush highlands of the Philippines, communities and people’s movements everywhere are succeeding in doing this. But we need to win more often. We must find new ways to stand alongside frontline communities and defend Earth’s defenders so they can continue to live the solutions and to share them with the world. This is the big challenge for networks and movements like Yes to Life, No to Mining, and we must rise to it.

We know that when there is the popular will, the grit, the determination, our nations can be encouraged do what is right. As Enteng Bautista reminds us, “Costa Rica has legislated a moratorium on fossil fuel exploration and mineral extraction. The island nation of Kiribati has proposed a global moratorium on coal. The Ogoni people of Nigeria have successfully kept oil companies out of their lands for years.”

The Paris deal places responsibility for climate action in the hands of individual states. So, in our home countries, especially those of us living in the Global North, we must escalate pressure on our governments to do their fair share to tackle climate change. A battle on many fronts, we need to look to initiatives like Canada’s Leap Manifesto for inspiration. We need policy for rapid national decarbonisation, to cut subsidies to big polluters and the fossil fuel industry, reign in corporations registered at home who are destroying and polluting abroad, scale up climate finance for more vulnerable nations with no strings attached, push for a Just Transition at home and call for diplomatic relations that encourage other nations to do the same. We must coordinate these national efforts internationally.

At the deepest level of all, it is imperative that we pioneer new ways to put Earth back at the centre of our collective thinking. Unless we act from a deep understanding that the health and the future of humanity are deeply interwoven with that of our living planet, our solutions will continue to be co-opted into business-as-usual. Knowledge of our dependence on Mother Earth must be our anchor in the times ahead.

Perhaps because it provided this anchor, for me, the most powerful event in the civil society spaces outside COP21was the International Rights of Nature Tribunal. The Tribunal advances a new legal paradigm that draws on Indigenous knowledge and governance systems, recognising nature’s inherent rights to exist, thrive and evolve. It represents one critical way to revive the planetary realism we need so desperately right now and is a model that should be taken and replicated elsewhere, and soon.

There is no one solution to climate crisis, no silver bullet. Nor can any one person, or government, or group of governments articulate an entire alternative system to our current one that is at war with people and planet. Rather, the systems change we want and so desperately need will emerge from the actions of our societies’, bravest, most vibrant, resilient and determined groups, who are driven by a moral imperative that transcends current norms and augurs a better future. Ever was it thus.

The path ahead won’t be easy and there are no guarantees we’ll be successful as the climate clock ticks. But the alternative- inaction and catastrophic climate change- is unconscionable.

Our hope must be manifested in struggle.


Other good sources of analysis

Paris Deal: Epic fail on a planetary scale (New Internationalist)

Analysis: the final Paris deal (Carbon Brief)

Grand promises of Paris climate deal undermined by squalid retrenchments (The Guardian)

See also the Deconstructing Paris blog for analysis of all drafts and a complete version of the final text.

 

Related Posts

Romania, Greece, South Africa: Three victories against destructive mining
Environmental conflicts can turn into solutions- new research
CAN WE TRUST ‘GREEN GROWTH’? DIY FACT CHECK

CAN WE TRUST ‘GREEN GROWTH’? DIY FACT CHECK

  • Written on: 04 May 2018
  • Posted under: Videos
Resource Sufficiency: Moving beyond the gospel of eco-efficiency
Extracting Metals from E-Waste Costs 13 Times Less Than Mining Ore
5 Stories of Resistance and Revival from 2017

5 Stories of Resistance and Revival from 2017

Highlights from the YLNM Network in 2017

Highlights from the YLNM Network in 2017

YLNM’s 2017 pick of films and tools for mining resistance
Press Release: Frontline defenders travel to London to counter Mines and Money conference between 25-30 November
The Dark Side of Digitalization: Will Industry 4.0 Create New Raw Materials Demands? 
New Report – UN Body Urges Mining Companies To Put Safety First
Cumarál to hold popular consultation on oil extraction in Andes foothills
Press Release: Apple’s Commitment to a No-Mining Future Makes Deep Sea Mining Unnecessary
Apple promises to stop mining minerals to make iPhones — it just isn’t sure how yet
Colossal Result in Cajamarca, Colombia Regarding Mining: building on the debate
Resistance, exchange, (post)extractivism: YLNM Coordinators meet in Galicia- in photos
Safeguarding People and the Environment in Chinese Investments- A guide for community advocactes
Cabrera: New Popular Consultation wins over mining in Colombia
On International Women’s Day, Honoring Women Land and Human Rights Defenders
YLNM joins ContraMINAcción to celebrate third Meeting on Impacts of Mining, in Galicia
Community Mapping & Resistance Ghana

Community Mapping & Resistance Ghana

  • Written on: 03 February 2017
  • Posted under: Videos
No to the plunder of our territories! Yes to ICCAs— territories of life!
Breaching environmental boundaries: UN report on resource limits
Breaching environmental boundaries: UN report on resource limits
Being Human: Death, Development and Earth’s Defenders
Beneath the surface: Practical films to help communities fight mining
BASIC PRINCIPLES FOR PROTECTING YOUR COMMUNITY FROM EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES
No fracking, drilling or digging: it’s the only way to save life on Earth
The Sky’s Limit: Why the Paris Climate Goals Require a Managed Decline of Fossil Fuel Production
World Conservation Congress Approves Historic Measure To Protect Indigenous Sacred Lands
Standing Rock protests: this is only the beginning
Protecting Your Community from Mining and Other Extractive Industries
ICC widens remit to include environmental destruction cases
Beautiful Rising

Beautiful Rising

Post-Growth and Post-Extractivism: Two Sides of the Same Cultural Transformation
Global Day Against Mega Mining: 4 Inspiring Stories of Resistance
Report: On Dangerous Ground- record number of environmental defenders killed in 2015
‘Responsible Extractives Summit’: Sick Joke or Serious Indictment of Industry?
Infographic: Tailings Dumping in Water Systems
Why Mining Corporations Love Trade Deals

Why Mining Corporations Love Trade Deals

TO COMBAT CLIMATE CHANGE, RESTORE LAND OWNERSHIP TO INDIGENOUS PEOPLES
REPORT: ON DANGEROUS GROUND, 3 Environmental Defenders killed every day defending their lands
2015 was the worst year on record for killings of land and environmental defenders
Three Environmental Defenders Killed Every Week in 2015
Call to action: Global Day Against Mega Mining 2016
Gender and the extractive industries: putting gender on the corporate agenda
Resource Roulette: How Deep Sea Mining and Inadequate Regulatory Frameworks Imperil the Pacific and its Peoples
Report: Investment Court System put to the test
#VideoAsEvidence

#VideoAsEvidence

  • Written on: 13 May 2016
  • Posted under: Videos
Video As Evidence: Field Guide | Witness Recursos
Disobedience

Disobedience

  • Written on: 03 May 2016
  • Posted under: Videos
The Journey of Coal from Colombia to Italy: The Curse of Extractivism
Latin American organizations hope for stronger accountability of Canadian mining overseas
Even the ‘Good’ Gold Mines Are Pretty Bad
Case Studies – Inspiring Stories from the Frontlines of Climate Change
Minando la Agricultura (Resumen)
Minando la Agricultura – Infografía
(Report) Mining: Enough is Enough
In Defence of Life

In Defence of Life

  • Written on: 18 April 2016
  • Posted under: Videos
Sister Stella Matutina – In Defence of Life

Sister Stella Matutina – In Defence of Life

  • Written on: 18 April 2016
  • Posted under: Videos
Nnimmo Bassey – In Defence of Life

Nnimmo Bassey – In Defence of Life

  • Written on: 18 April 2016
  • Posted under: Videos
Stephan Harding – In Defence of Life

Stephan Harding – In Defence of Life

  • Written on: 18 April 2016
  • Posted under: Videos
Mariana Gomez Soto – In Defence of Life

Mariana Gomez Soto – In Defence of Life

  • Written on: 18 April 2016
  • Posted under: Videos
Vandana Shiva – In Defence of Life

Vandana Shiva – In Defence of Life

  • Written on: 18 April 2016
  • Posted under: Videos
Impacts of Mining: Gendered Impacts

Impacts of Mining: Gendered Impacts

  • Written on: 08 April 2016
  • Posted under: Videos
Water is Life: Don’t UnderMine It

Water is Life: Don’t UnderMine It

  • Written on: 22 March 2016
  • Posted under: Videos
Report: UnderMining the Water Cycle
Study: Human Rights Risks in Mining
Common Ground: Securing Land Rights and Safeguarding the Earth
Ibagué will be the first city in the world to take mining to public scrutiny
Global patterns of metal extractivism, 1950–2010: Providing the bones for the industrial society’s skeleton
We need a real “Alternatives to Mining” Indaba
Roşia Montană, A New Beginning – Screening and talk on building resilient communities
To Mine or not to Mine, that is the Question – Referendum in Tolima, Colombia
World Bank lowers 2016 outlook on 37 of the 46 commodities it tracks
At the Coalface: Ten more years of UK coal burning a lifetime on the ground
Mining’s $1.4 trillion plunge is like losing Apple, Google and Exxon combined
YLNM interview at D12 Paris climate march

YLNM interview at D12 Paris climate march

  • Written on: 17 December 2015
  • Posted under: Videos
COP Out: The hollow promise of the Paris climate deal
At COP21, the people and future generations will be failed once again
COP21: Call for international recognition of rights of nature and communities
It’s time to create Annex 0!
Indigenous Peoples’ Caucus Statement to the 4th UN Forum on Business and Human Rights
Community Environmental Monitoring Guide
Rights of Nature and Mother Earth: Sowing seeds of resistance, love and change
Yes to Life and Climate Justice, No to Mining and Climate Catastrophe! (EN/FR)
Panel on Extractivism, the Law, and Human Rights
Yes to Life, No to Mining participates in the workshop “Mining and Energy Multinational Companies Strategies and Participation Mechanisms for Communities Defending their Territory” – Caquetá, Colombia
Free Trade Agreement 101

Free Trade Agreement 101

  • Written on: 17 November 2015
  • Posted under: Videos
Report: How Strengthening Community Forest Rights Mitigates Climate Change
Empty promises: G20 subsidies to oil, gas and coal production
Community Rights & Resource Justice in Guinea

Community Rights & Resource Justice in Guinea

  • Written on: 12 November 2015
  • Posted under: Videos
Oilwatch COP21 proposal: Annex Zero
Interviews: Festival of Resistances and Rebellions

Interviews: Festival of Resistances and Rebellions

  • Written on: 23 October 2015
  • Posted under: Videos
Collected Materials: The Persecution and Violation of Earth and Human Rights Defenders
Measuring the Growth of the Global Fossil Fuel Divestment and Clean Energy Investment Movement
UK: Community opponents of planned Field House coal mine buoyed by international solidarity
Yaigojé-Apaporis: Colombian Constitutional Court decision to reject mining could change the history of the Amazon
What do you know about mining? | CATAPA – Generation Transition
Fighting Conga: an emblematic case – Perú

Fighting Conga: an emblematic case – Perú

Our Resistance, Our Hope: Unity Statement of the International People’s Conference on Mining
Sustainable development is failing but there are alternatives to capitalism
Banks, Sign the Paris Pledge, Quit Coal!

Banks, Sign the Paris Pledge, Quit Coal!

  • Written on: 02 September 2015
  • Posted under: Campaigns
Collected Readings on Post-Extractivism
Study: Tailings Dam Failures On The Rise
Community Consent Index 2015
The right to say “No”: Indigenous rights experts on FPIC
ICT’s for Feminist Movement Building
‘Our Resistance, Our Hope’: A global unity forged to resist devastation of global mining liberalization
International People’s Conference on Mining 2015: A call for global solidarity against destructive mining
Colombia was part of the Global Day for Action Against Mega Mining
What can I do on the Global Day of Action Against Mega Mining?
22 July 2015 – Global Day of Action Against Mega Mining- DÍA MUNDIAL CONTRA LA MEGAMINERÍA
Mercury, contaminating agent – information leaflet
Caquetá, Colombia blocks petroleum extraction in the Andes-Amazon foothills
Africa-UK Civil Society Letter to the Mining on Top Africa: London Summit
Local researchers from YAIA receive the Equator Initiative Prize from UNDP in the Amazon
Mining Affected Peoples to Unite at International Peoples Conference on Mining, Manila 2015
A Guide for the Defense of Water
YLNM Global Solidarity Network promotes the Great Carnival Parade in Colombia
Glencore? No More! London protestors call for end to Glencore’s mining abuses in the Philippines and worldwide
Support the Maputo Declaration on Climate Justice!
Colombia in defense of water and the páramo high mountain ecosystems
Wangan and Jagalingou Peoples defend their land from Adani’s Carmichael Coal Mine
Women‘s Perspectives on the Impact of Mining on the Right to Food
Towards environmental justice success in mining resistances:  An empirical investigation
A Healthy Relationship? Wellcome Trust’s refusal to cut ties with fossil fuel industry is unacceptable
African civil society and global allies challenge Chatham House conference on ‘Extractive Industries in Africa’
The Legacy of Drummond in Colombia

The Legacy of Drummond in Colombia

  • Written on: 12 March 2015
  • Posted under: Videos
New Water Grabbing Platform Unites With Yes to Life, No to Mining
Rights of Nature Tribunals
Nnimmo Bassey says #YestoLifeNotoMining

Nnimmo Bassey says #YestoLifeNotoMining

  • Written on: 11 December 2014
  • Posted under: Videos
In Solidarity – En Solidaridad

In Solidarity – En Solidaridad

  • Written on: 11 December 2014
  • Posted under: Videos
Wake Up Call

Wake Up Call

  • Written on: 11 December 2014
  • Posted under: Videos
Idle No More: Movement for Indigenous Sovereignty

Idle No More: Movement for Indigenous Sovereignty

  • Written on: 04 December 2014
  • Posted under: Campaigns
Mining affected communities around the world say ‘No to Mining’ and seek to secure No Go Areas at the IUCN World Parks Congress
Mapping Violations of Human and Environmental Rights
Campaigns Against Coal

Campaigns Against Coal

  • Written on: 24 October 2014
  • Posted under: Campaigns
Deep Sea Mining Campaign

Deep Sea Mining Campaign

  • Written on: 22 October 2014
  • Posted under: Campaigns
MiningWatch Canada: Reports
Undermining Agriculture

Undermining Agriculture

  • Written on: 12 October 2014
  • Posted under: Campaigns
Yes to Life, No to mining Global Precedents
Insight Shares Guides to Participatory Video
Mining & Health: A Community-Centered Health Assessment Toolkit
Eradicating ecocide – a global campaign to change the legal system
The Campaign for Fossil Fuel Divestment

The Campaign for Fossil Fuel Divestment

  • Written on: 08 October 2014
  • Posted under: Campaigns
The Anti-Fracking Movement

The Anti-Fracking Movement

  • Written on: 08 October 2014
  • Posted under: Campaigns
Pitfalls & Pipelines: Indigenous Peoples and Extractive Industries
The Gaia Foundation: Opening Pandora’s Box Report
guides for Protecting Your Community Against Mining Companies

2 Reader Comments

    1. Rowan says:

      Thanks for sharing Ben! A really important way of looking at climate change- would you be happy for us to include these references in our 'Toolkit' section, with short descriptors?

Start a Conversation. Share Words of Solidarity.

This website is about building a movement. We can only build a movement when we connect with one another. We invite you to do just that…

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *